Answers
to
Your
Questions
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: MAX Muzzleloader Blog- MAX Rifle-Specific Load Data Books
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 11:59:49 -0400
To: MAX Muzzleloader rlynch@maxmuzzleloader.com
You're a good writer, Russel. I have a MFA (Masters of Fine Arts) degree from Columbia in Fiction Writing. So I know good writing. All your stuff is very well written.
I have recently bought a CVA Accura in .45 caliber. I know you aren't crazy about .45 caliber muzzy rifles because you say the selection of bullets is poor. But you've admitted to me they are superior ballistically (somewhat). Flatter shooting. I bought a .45 owing to what Chad and the other guy in that CVA video "Blackpowder 101' said. Also, several guys from the gun stores here in Fort Wayne, Indiana prefer the .45 muzzy (for deer) due to it's flatter trajectory.
Now, Russel, IF you are the leading expert regarding cutting edge accuracy in modern muzzleloading rifles, then, I'm sorry, you HAVE to test at leeast ONE rifle in .45. You actually don't even have a choice IF you are what you say you are: the leading expert. I know a half dozen people (along with CVA Chad and the other CVA guy) who prefer the .45. Russel, .45s are a part of the modern muzzleloading rifle scene. If you don't include us .45 users, then you are not the overall leading expert in muzzy rifle technology. If you can't include SOME loads for, say the CVA Accura (my gun), or SOME .45 cal muzzy rifle, than you are a liar.
I really need, and would greatly appreciate, some top loads in the ,45 cal for my CVA Accura. You ALREADY spend hours and hours testing loads for multiple rifles. You wouldn't even notice a couple more three to five shots groups for a .45 cal CVA Accura at the end of each shooting day. Why can't you BE a full and complete EXPERT in ALL the calibers available today? If you ARE an expert, you HAVE to work up a few loads in .45 caliber. There is a definate group of muzzy rifle hunters--like myself--who are waiting for you to do what you say you do. We're out there. And we need your loads.
PLEASE include loads for OUR guns, so that you CAN be the expert you claim to be.
Russell, I am not in the least trying to piss you off, but I could really use your help. So there are not a great variety of bullets out there in .45 cal. There are SOME good bullets out there in .45, like the Precison bullets DEAD CENTER 200 and 220 grain bullets (which are the bullets I plan to use). Why can't you be the expert you say you are and help out us .45 cal guys? Chad and the other CVA can't be wrong about the .45, can they"
If you don't beleive me about the CVA guys--for deer sized game--preffering the .45, then watch the "Blackpowder 101" video.
Russell, you impress the Hell out of me for what you're doing, except that you, right now, are NOT the expert you claim you are. It won't affect your day much at all to include a couple of extra groups for the .45. Please become what you say you already are. Please give me some good load data for my .45).
Thank you for your work and your time.
Fort Wayne, IN
This is an email I received about the new Rifle Specific M.A.X. Load Data Books. First of all, I see that his degree is in fiction writing, and I sure hope everyone knows that anything I have to say is pure NON-FICTION.
Now that we have that cleared up, you can see that this person wants some data on the .45 caliber muzzleloader. I do believe the .45 will make somewhat of a comeback, but not to the extent that even the most dedicated marketing campaign by any manufacture will have everyone selling their .50 cal’s to get one.
The guys in the video he mentioned, Chad Schearer of Shoot Straight with Chad Schearer and O’Neil Williams of O'Neil Outside, are both accomplished hunters to say the least. But remember, they both work for CVA and they say what they need to say to sell what they're paid to sell. But If anyone purchases a .45 because of the video, then Chad & O'Neil have done their job.
I really don’t know but a few people who are using a .45, but I’m sure there are quite a few of you out there. The new inline .45's lost a lot of fans some years ago when the manufactures had the twist rate of the rifling screwed up and they just would not hold a group. Unfortunately for them, that has carried over to today somewhat.
Another big problem for the 45’s in today’s market is that the 50’s own the market which = shelf-space in the stores. So, there are very few accessories available over-the counter, to include bullets.
There are some good bullets available for the .45, the best probably being made by Mr. Cecile Epps at Precision Bullets. I really must say I don’t remember saying that the 45 was ballistic superior to the 50’s, so I’m glad the word “somewhat” was used. Without getting into a big explanation, just remember, smaller, lighter and faster doesn't mean better. A good example to look at would be in the centerfire world and that being the age-old comparison of the .270 and the 30/06. For the first 200 yards the 270 is flatter and faster, after that +/- a few, the 30/06 is the clear winner. I know it’s not the same thing, but it’s the same principle.
It’s not that I’m not a fan of the 45 ML, I just don’t have any time behind the butt of one nor the interest from my customers for the information. If I get time to play in the future, it maybe with a 45, but I’m having a lot of fun with the 50's and will be for a while. I’ve got three new 50 cal rifle videos due out before year’s end and 4 data book’s for 50’s.
I must say however, I really appreciate the kind words about me and MAX. I loved getting called out and I love a good challenge. But as I get older, I’ve learned not only to pick my battles, but when to fight them. He went a little too far with some of this, but mostly with the liar part, that did pi.. me off a little to start with, but I’m over it.
45 data is something I need to get to and will, when it’s time and I have time. I’m not putting the 45 down and I’m certainly not putting anyone down for buying and choosing one for their deer rifle, I just don’t know anything much about the new ones. Heck, call Chad or O’Neil.
For now I’m going to stick with something I learned in the Marine Corps and Law Enforcement, that being “the needs of the many over the needs of the few”. So for now, it's back to the range with my 50's.









